Meeting Bloom vs. Top 4 Abstract Software Companies

Top Abstract Management Companies

1. MeetingBloom.com

Pricing Model: 4 month free trial period, and upfront pricing. $6 per submission.
Key Features Included:
- Registration, abstract submission, project management, dedicated conference website, workshops, email communications, detailed reports, polls, surveys, blogs, gamification, award submissions, and peer review processes.
- Free 4-month trial.
- No hidden fees or additional transaction costs.
- Customization options and efficient software optimized for no maintenance costs.
Advantages:
- Designed with an academic focus, offering user-friendly software tailored to meet the needs of researchers and conference organizers.
- Designed by academic researchers for academic conferences.
- Streamlined call-for-speakers process and integrated event management.
- Transparent pricing with no base licensing fees or percentage-based transaction fees.
- Comprehensive features at a competitive price point, saving approximately $12–$21 per submission compared to competitors.

2. Cvent

Pricing Model: Reported to be more than three times higher than other platforms.
Key Features Included:
- Customizable submission forms, email automation, peer review, and real-time tracking of submissions.
Advantages:
- End-to-end event management solution with robust features.
Disadvantages:
- Expensive, with a lack of intuitive user interface / no user-friendly experience.

3. Whova

Pricing Model: Pricing not explicitly stated, but reported to have a steep learning curve and higher time investment.
Key Features Included:
- Centralized submission process, customizable email campaigns, and efficient reviewer assignment.
Advantages:
- Streamlined call-for-speakers process and integrated event management.
Disadvantages:
- Limited flexibility in turning off certain features, and frequent automated emails may cause inconvenience.

4. Ex Ordo

Pricing Model: No free version or trial; paid plans only.
Key Features Included:
- Customizable submission forms, peer review automation, and mobile-friendly access.
Advantages:
- Simplified workflows and collaborative reviewing tools.
Disadvantages:
- Lack of a free trial may deter users from testing the platform before committing.

5. Fourwaves

Pricing Model: Pricing not explicitly stated.
Key Features Included:
- Drag-and-drop form builder, versatile peer review options, and integrated abstract management.
Advantages:
- Designed by academic researchers for academic conferences.
Disadvantages:
- Integration with other systems may pose challenges.

Summary

Software	Pricing Model	Key Advantages	Key Disadvantages
MeetingBloom	$6 per submission (all-inclusive)	Academic focus, easy to use software, detailed peer review, no hidden fees	A smaller, more specialized company
Cvent	High (3x competitors)	End-to-end event management	Expensive, less user-friendly
Whova	Not disclosed	Streamlined submission process	Steep learning curve, inflexible features
Ex Ordo	Paid plans only	Simplified workflows, collaborative reviewing	No free trial
Fourwaves	Not disclosed	Academic focus, versatile peer review	Integration challenges

Conclusion

MeetingBloom.com stands out for its academic focus, transparent and affordable pricing model at $6 per submission, which includes a wide range of features without hidden costs. In contrast, competitors like Cvent and Whova either lack pricing transparency or are significantly more expensive. While Ex Ordo and Fourwaves offer competitive features, they fall short in areas like integration flexibility. For organizers seeking a cost-effective, all-in-one solution, MeetingBloom.com is the clear winner.

	Customer Reviews